Aandelen die je kunt vertrouwen, picks die niet missen.

De uitdaging

Handmatige tellingen zijn traag en foutgevoelig, en onnauwkeurige stockdrives veroorzaken verkeerde picks, retouren en verlies van fulfilfilmentsnelheid.

Onze aanpak

• Passieve RFID voor snelle, nauwkeurige inventarisatie en cyclitellingen.
• BLE en Wi-Fi RTLS voor zichtbaarheid van assets en workflows in de faciliteit.
• Kies verificatie om fouten te voorkomen.
• Continuous stock reconciliation against the WMS .
• Dashboards voor nauwkeurigheid, doorvoer en arbeid.

Technologie & integratie

Stack ingezet: Passieve UHF (REGEN) RFID, BLE en Wi-Fi RTLS verspreid over het distributiecentrum.

Integratie: WMS / ERP , order management, and fulfilment dashboards.

Resultaat: "Magazijnzichtbaarheid verbeterde snelheid, nauwkeurigheid en orderbetrouwbaarheid."

Gerelateerd: Logistiek RTLS · 3PL dok en werf · Technologieën vergelijken

Composite example only. Your payback depends on adoption, integration quality and exception labour — not tag unit cost. Named references under NDA on engagement.

We challenge any vendor who asks you to accept demo-day averages as production truth.

For fulfilment, size exception labour and validate peak heatmaps with ops leads before CapEx scale.

Buyer checklist before you sign: (1) written system of record for events; (2) acceptance tests with 95th-percentile performance under real interference; (3) integration owner named in IT/OT; (4) privacy or labour consultation path if people are tagged; (5) cybersecurity zoning sketch; (6) five-year TCO including batteries, spares, recalibration and SLA escalations; (7) exit/export terms so you are not hostage to a cloud tenant; (8) a pilot that can fail without political punishment.

Vendor claims to challenge in this pattern: brochure accuracy without production load; 'compliance included' without artefacts; ROI that assumes perfect adoption in 30 days; references that cannot be called under NDA; install partners who have never worked your vertical's overlays; shared support accounts; and any design that dumps locating onto a flat plant or clinical VLAN.

How TRACIO typically engages: stage-1 architecture and measurement design; leveranciersneutraal shortlist and RFP language; pilot acceptance criteria; then optional implementation oversight or programme rescue if a prior pilot stalled. We stay independent of hardware margin. Composite pages like this one exist so you can prepare the workshop — your numbers replace every planning band when we model payback.

Risk register themes that recur: mute fatigue on alerts; shadow spreadsheets reappearing beside the platform; battery logistics understaffed; master data too weak to support identity; works-council or IG review starting too late; and success declared on demo day before night-shift reality.

Document baseline windows explicitly: what you measured, for how long, which shifts, and what you excluded. Investment committees and auditors both punish fuzzy before/after stories. If your baseline is weak, spend two to four weeks fixing measurement before ordering anchors or portals. That discipline is cheaper than a stranded deployment and is the difference between a locating programme and a technology souvenir.

Training and communications plan: who explains purpose to operators, how often refreshers run, how contractors are inducted, and how successes are fed back without turning safety systems into league tables. Budget a champion network on each shift. Platforms do not adopt themselves. Where unions or works councils exist, share the purpose statement and retention rules early — surprise monitoring is how programmes die. Finally, schedule a formal gate review against the written criteria; celebrate a no-go if evidence is weak. Expanding failure is not delivery.