Verplaats patiënten sneller — en stop met zoeken naar pompen.

De uitdaging

Klinisch personeel besteedt 30–60 minuten per dienst aan het zoeken naar apparatuur; 10–20% van de mobiele activa raakt in hun levensduur verdwenen; Knelpunten in de patiëntenstroom zijn onzichtbaar totdat ze bijten.

Onze aanpak

• BLE 5.x AoA / RTLS voor apparatuur en, waar passend, mijlpalen in de patiëntstroom.
• Benutting van analyses om de vloot op de juiste maat te zetten en de huurprijzen te verminderen.
• Zichtbaarheid van bed-turn en ED-mijlpalen voor flow.
• Handhygiëne / veiligheidstoepassingen als fase twee.
• Integreer met EMR en biomed CMMS.

Technologie & integratie

Stack ingezet: BLE 5.x AoA , UWB for high-accuracy zones, Passive RFID for supply rooms.

Integratie: Epic / Cerner (Oracle Health) / Meditech, biomed CMMS, capaciteitssystemen.

Gerelateerd: RTLS voor ziekenhuizen · Gezondheidszorg RTLS · Ziekenhuisapparatuur RTLS

Patient-flow RTLS ties location to pathway timers (ED, theatres, beds). It engages PHI — BAA, minimum necessary, and clear clinical owners are mandatory. Often sequenced after equipment RTLS succeeds.

Integrate with EHR/ADT and capacity boards; do not build a parallel census.

Composite example only. Your payback depends on adoption, integration quality and exception labour — not tag unit cost. Named references under NDA on engagement.

We challenge any vendor who asks you to accept demo-day averages as production truth.

Pick one pathway with an executive owner. Complete privacy assessment. Integrate ADT/EHR status. Train unit clerks and charge nurses on the board that matters — retire the shadow whiteboard deliberately.

Measure pathway segment times against baseline. If owners do not attend weekly reviews, pause expansion. Staff location for flow needs separate labour consultation where applicable.

Challenge platforms that bury PHI joins in default cloud analytics.

For patient flow, require a named pathway owner and PHI-minimised architecture before any wristband discussion.

Buyer checklist before you sign: (1) written system of record for events; (2) acceptance tests with 95th-percentile performance under real interference; (3) integration owner named in IT/OT; (4) privacy or labour consultation path if people are tagged; (5) cybersecurity zoning sketch; (6) five-year TCO including batteries, spares, recalibration and SLA escalations; (7) exit/export terms so you are not hostage to a cloud tenant; (8) a pilot that can fail without political punishment.

Vendor claims to challenge in this pattern: brochure accuracy without production load; 'compliance included' without artefacts; ROI that assumes perfect adoption in 30 days; references that cannot be called under NDA; install partners who have never worked your vertical's overlays; shared support accounts; and any design that dumps locating onto a flat plant or clinical VLAN.

How TRACIO typically engages: stage-1 architecture and measurement design; leveranciersneutraal shortlist and RFP language; pilot acceptance criteria; then optional implementation oversight or programme rescue if a prior pilot stalled. We stay independent of hardware margin. Composite pages like this one exist so you can prepare the workshop — your numbers replace every planning band when we model payback.

Risk register themes that recur: mute fatigue on alerts; shadow spreadsheets reappearing beside the platform; battery logistics understaffed; master data too weak to support identity; works-council or IG review starting too late; and success declared on demo day before night-shift reality.

Document baseline windows explicitly: what you measured, for how long, which shifts, and what you excluded. Investment committees and auditors both punish fuzzy before/after stories. If your baseline is weak, spend two to four weeks fixing measurement before ordering anchors or portals. That discipline is cheaper than a stranded deployment and is the difference between a locating programme and a technology souvenir.