Mijnbouw, Olie & GasGeanonimiseerde casestudy — cliëntidentiteit vertrouwelijk.
Mijnbouw, Olie & Gas · Casestudy

Houd mensen en machines uit elkaar — en houd rekening met iedereen in een noodsituatie.

Een mijn of zwaarindustrieel terrein moet voertuig-voetgangersincidenten voorkomen en rekening houden met elke werknemer die snel bij een evacuatie werkt, over mijnen, fabrieken en ondergronds.

CASESTUDYBotsingsvermijdingMijnbouw, Olie & Gas · CasestudyUWBLive-positie · UWBReal-timeVoertuig-pedest100%Aantal medewerkersSnellerEvacuatie
Uitkomsten

Wat het programma heeft geleverd.

Real-time

Voertuig-voetgangersnabijheidswaarschuwingen in dode hoeken.

100%

Verantwoordelijkheid van het aantal medewerkers bij de stemming.

Sneller

Evacuatieverantwoording versus handmatige oproep.

Composite worked example — figures are ranges from comparable programmes, not attributed named-client results. Named references available under NDA. We model your own numbers when you engage.

De uitdaging

Dode vlekken rond zware machines vormen een dodelijk risico. Handmatig verzamelen is traag en onzeker wanneer minuten ertoe doen.

Onze aanpak

  • UWB / nabijheidstags voor voertuig-voetgangersdetectiezones.
  • Waarschuwingen in de cabine en snelheidshandhaving in de zone.
  • Realtime verzamelpunten met verificatie van het aantal medewerkers.
  • Eenzame werknemer en dwang voor geïsoleerde gebieden.
  • Integreer met veiligheids- en wagenparksystemen.

Technologie & integratie

Stack ingezet: UWB / proximity RTLS, robuuste wearables, cabine-units; LoRaWAN voor breed-gebied.

Integratie: Veiligheids- / EHS-systemen, vlootbeheer, toegangscontrole.

Gerelateerd: Mijnbouw van RTLS · Mijnveiligheid & verzameling · UWB vs BLE

Programmapatroon voor deze vertical

Surface and underground mines typically phase collision avoidance: instrument a high-risk fleet slice and one production level, prove escalating proximity zones and in-cab alerts, then expand. UWB or dedicated proximity radios dominate where GNSS fails; LoRaWAN often carries wide-area telemetry and SOS.

Integration targets are EHS incident systems, fleet dispatch and access control — not a standalone safety app. Mustering is usually co-designed so the same wearable identity supports evacuation headcount.

Resultaten die je mag verwachten — en hoe ze verdiend worden

Comparable programmes aim for fewer vehicle–pedestrian near-misses in instrumented zones, faster verified muster, and a review ritual that ties alerts to coaching — not mute fatigue. Figures vary with fleet mix and culture; we model yours from baseline near-miss and roll-call data.

Success looks like supervisors trusting the alert ladder and workers trusting that privacy is limited to safety purposes.

Lessen uit vergelijkbare programma's

Failure modes: alerting without zone calibration in metal-dense headings; no ownership of false-positive review; treating lab ranging specs as underground truth; skipping union/workforce consultation on wearables.

Keep productivity tracking out of the safety business case. It poisons adoption.

Diepere probleemframing

Haul-truck and light-vehicle interactions in pits, plus pedestrian exposure at crushers and workshops, create fatality risk that radio call-outs cannot manage at shift scale. Near-miss reporting is inconsistent; culture may punish reporting. Underground headings add multipath and infrastructure limits that invalidate open-pit GNSS assumptions.

Procurement pressure often pushes 'collision avoidance' as a single SKU. In practice you are buying a system of wearables, vehicle units, alerting logic, training and EHS review rituals.

Aanpak die ondergronds en bovengronds standhoudt

Phase instrumentation on the worst fleet segment; calibrate escalating zones with operators aboard; integrate alerts into in-cab workflow without mute culture; co-design muster identity on the same wearable where possible.

Run RF surveys in representative headings, not only workshops. Define false-positive review owners before go-live. Align with existing isolation and traffic management rules so digital alerts do not contradict site law.

Uitkomstbanden en meetdiscipline

Comparable programmes seek fewer serious near-misses in instrumented zones, faster verified headcount in drills, and a coaching loop tied to alert data. Exact percentages vary; measure your own baseline for 4–8 weeks first.

Exclude lab ranging sheets and any period without a live review ritual from claimed success.

Governance, risico en wat we weigeren te claimen

These pages remain composite worked examples — not named-client results. We will not attribute percentages to a confidential site. When you engage, we rebuild baselines from your incidents, labour samples and system logs.

We refuse vanity accuracy claims without a coverage map, and we refuse programmes that silently add productivity surveillance onto a safety business case without a fresh DPIA or labour consultation.

Implementatiesequentie en change management

Week 0–2: baseline near-miss and roll-call timing; traffic rules review; union/workforce briefing on safety-only purpose. Week 3–6: instrument pilot fleet and one level; calibrate zones with operators; mute-prevention training. Week 7–12: expand fleet; connect EHS logging; first scored drill.

Budget for spare wearables, charger discipline and a named false-positive owner. If supervisors treat every alert as noise, redesign zones before buying more tags. Technology last — traffic management and training first.

Competitive note: several proximity vendors will claim plug-and-play. Ask for underground references, spoofing/security posture, and integration to your incident system — not only ranging charts.

Hetzelfde probleem op jouw vloer?

Laten we de echte cijfers voor je operatie bekijken.

Dertig minuten over je use case, omgeving en doelen — leveranciersneutraal, geen reseller-marge.

Boek een gratis gesprek van 30 minutenBekijk de leverancierselectie-checklistDownload de kopersgids

Laatst bijgewerkt: