Wat het programma heeft opgeleverd.
Serial–CMDB match.
Faster cycle counting.
Change-window serial mismatches.
Composite worked example — figures are ranges from comparable programmes, not attributed named-client results. Named references available under NDA. We model your own numbers when you engage.
De uitdaging
Handmatige cage-tellingen zijn traag, en inbound serials die nooit in de CMDB belanden leiden tot mislukte changes, spook-spares en auditrisico.
Onze aanpak
- Passieve RFID voor dock-ontvangst, cage-inventaris en spare-pool-identiteit.
- BLE / Wi-Fi RTLS for high-value asset and people visibility on the floor.
- Change-window verification so the serial on the ticket matches the serial on the rail.
- Continuous reconciliation of tagged kit against DCIM / CMDB.
- Operational views for match rate, retrieval time and change success — in systems the team already uses.
Technologie & integratie
Stack deployed: Passive UHF (RAIN) RFID, BLE and Wi-Fi RTLS across the data hall and spare cages.
Integration: DCIM / CMDB, ITSM change tickets, and operations views.
Outcome: “Dock-to-rack identity cut ghost spares and made change windows boring — in a good way.”
Gerelateerd: Datacenters RTLS · Serialized chain-of-custody · Compare technologies
Last updated:
Hall-identiteit en CMDB
Onafhankelijk advies means the radio is chosen last — after the job, the constraints and the system of record are clear.
Dock-to-rack and spare pools
Serial truth against DCIM/CMDB before another monitoring pane.
Metal-dense selection
On-metal RFID and portal design beat office-grade BLE fantasies.
Independence in the hall
No platform of our own; you buy hardware direct.
Meting
Baseline: CMDB-vs-cage steekproeven en change-tickets gesloten met “verkeerd serienummer / niet gevonden” over 4–6 weken. Pilot: één hall of spare cage met dock-RFID en CMDB-terugschrijving. Steady-state: serie–CMDB-matchrate, gemiddelde spare-ophaaltijd en seriemismatches in change windows. KPI-banden zijn typisch voor dit programmavorm.