Co dostarczył program.
Serial–CMDB match.
Faster cycle counting.
Change-window serial mismatches.
Composite worked example — figures are ranges from comparable programmes, not attributed named-client results. Named references available under NDA. We model your own numbers when you engage.
Wyzwanie
Ręczne zliczanie klatek jest wolne, a numery seryjne, które nigdy nie trafiają do CMDB, powodują nieudane change’e, duchy części i ryzyko audytu.
Nasze podejście
- Pasywne RFID do przyjęcia na docku, inwentaryzacji klatek i tożsamości puli części.
- BLE / Wi-Fi RTLS for high-value asset and people visibility on the floor.
- Change-window verification so the serial on the ticket matches the serial on the rail.
- Continuous reconciliation of tagged kit against DCIM / CMDB.
- Operational views for match rate, retrieval time and change success — in systems the team already uses.
Technologia i integracja
Stack deployed: Passive UHF (RAIN) RFID, BLE and Wi-Fi RTLS across the data hall and spare cages.
Integration: DCIM / CMDB, ITSM change tickets, and operations views.
Outcome: “Dock-to-rack identity cut ghost spares and made change windows boring — in a good way.”
Powiązane: Centra danych RTLS · Serialized chain-of-custody · Compare technologies
Last updated:
Tożsamość hali i CMDB
Niezależne doradztwo means the radio is chosen last — after the job, the constraints and the system of record are clear.
Dock-to-rack and spare pools
Serial truth against DCIM/CMDB before another monitoring pane.
Metal-dense selection
On-metal RFID and portal design beat office-grade BLE fantasies.
Independence in the hall
No platform of our own; you buy hardware direct.
Pomiar
Baseline: kontrole CMDB vs klatka oraz ticketów change zamkniętych z „zły numer / nie znaleziono” przez 4–6 tygodni. Pilotaż: jedna hala lub klatka części z RFID na docku i zapisem do CMDB. Stan ustalony: zgodność seria–CMDB, średni czas wyszukania części i niedopasowania numerów w oknach zmian. Pasma KPI są typowe dla tego kształtu programu.