ProductieGeanonimiseerde casestudy — cliëntidentiteit vertrouwelijk.
Productie · Casestudy

Bekijk elke klus op de vloer — en vind de echte beperking.

Een fabriek verliest tijd met het zoeken naar WIP-carriers, gereedschap en trolleys, en kan niet zien waar de banen daadwerkelijk in de rij staan. OEE stagneert omdat de echte bottleneck onzichtbaar is.

CASESTUDYWIP-zichtbaarheid & OEEProductie · CasestudyUWBLive-positie · UWB99%+WIP-locatie+6–9 puntenTypische OEE-versterking
Uitkomsten

Wat het programma heeft geleverd.

−50–80%

Tijd besteed aan het zoeken naar assets / in werk.

99%+

WIP-locatienauwkeurigheid versus handmatige tracking.

+6–9 punten

Typische OEE-winst door het de-bottlenecken.

Composite worked example — figures are ranges from comparable programmes, not attributed named-client results. Named references available under NDA. We model your own numbers when you engage.

De uitdaging

Het volgen van papieren en barcode in het werk is verouderd zodra het wordt geregistreerd. Personeel loopt om te zoeken; managers raden de beperking; Herbalanceren gaat langzaam.

Onze aanpak

  • Tag WIP-providers, tools en belangrijke mobiele assets.
  • UWB waar submeterzonenauwkeurigheid van belang is; BLE voor kostengevoelige bestemmingsplannen.
  • Zone-analyse om de echte bottleneck bloot te leggen.
  • Geautomatiseerde voortgang van werkorders vanaf locatiegebeurtenissen.
  • Koppel aan MES voor gesloten roosters.

Technologie & integratie

Stack ingezet: UWB (10–30 cm, <100 ms) for precision zones, BLE for broad coverage, Passive RFID for read-points.

Integratie: MES , ERP , SCADA / historian, quality systems.

Gerelateerd: RTLS voor productie · UWB vs BLE · Productie van RTLS

Programmapatroon voor deze vertical

WIP locating for discrete manufacturing ties carriers or units to stations for flow, ageing and OEE loss trees. UHF RFID and UWB both appear depending on metal and accuracy needs.

MES integration decides whether OEE moves or only dashboards multiply.

Governance, risico en wat we weigeren te claimen

Composite example only. Your payback depends on adoption, integration quality and exception labour — not tag unit cost. Named references under NDA on engagement.

We challenge any vendor who asks you to accept demo-day averages as production truth.

Implementatiesequentie en change management

Agree the flow unit with supervisors. Tag it. Join MES. Change the daily meeting agenda to live queues. RF survey for metal. Reject accuracy theatre without meeting behaviour change.

KPIs: search minutes, ageing WIP, OEE loss credibility.

Koperschecklist, leveranciersuitdagingen en engagementvorm

For WIP/OEE, change the production meeting ritual in the pilot scope or do not expand.

Buyer checklist before you sign: (1) written system of record for events; (2) acceptance tests with 95th-percentile performance under real interference; (3) integration owner named in IT/OT; (4) privacy or labour consultation path if people are tagged; (5) cybersecurity zoning sketch; (6) five-year TCO including batteries, spares, recalibration and SLA escalations; (7) exit/export terms so you are not hostage to a cloud tenant; (8) a pilot that can fail without political punishment.

Vendor claims to challenge in this pattern: brochure accuracy without production load; 'compliance included' without artefacts; ROI that assumes perfect adoption in 30 days; references that cannot be called under NDA; install partners who have never worked your vertical's overlays; shared support accounts; and any design that dumps locating onto a flat plant or clinical VLAN.

How TRACIO typically engages: stage-1 architecture and measurement design; leveranciersneutraal shortlist and RFP language; pilot acceptance criteria; then optional implementation oversight or programme rescue if a prior pilot stalled. We stay independent of hardware margin. Composite pages like this one exist so you can prepare the workshop — your numbers replace every planning band when we model payback.

Risk register themes that recur: mute fatigue on alerts; shadow spreadsheets reappearing beside the platform; battery logistics understaffed; master data too weak to support identity; works-council or IG review starting too late; and success declared on demo day before night-shift reality.

Document baseline windows explicitly: what you measured, for how long, which shifts, and what you excluded. Investment committees and auditors both punish fuzzy before/after stories. If your baseline is weak, spend two to four weeks fixing measurement before ordering anchors or portals. That discipline is cheaper than a stranded deployment and is the difference between a locating programme and a technology souvenir.

Training and communications plan: who explains purpose to operators, how often refreshers run, how contractors are inducted, and how successes are fed back without turning safety systems into league tables. Budget a champion network on each shift. Platforms do not adopt themselves. Where unions or works councils exist, share the purpose statement and retention rules early — surprise monitoring is how programmes die. Finally, schedule a formal gate review against the written criteria; celebrate a no-go if evidence is weak. Expanding failure is not delivery.

Hetzelfde probleem op jouw vloer?

Laten we de echte cijfers voor je operatie bekijken.

Dertig minuten over je use case, omgeving en doelen — leveranciersneutraal, geen reseller-marge.

Boek een gratis gesprek van 30 minutenBekijk de leverancierselectie-checklistDownload de kopersgids

Laatst bijgewerkt: