La visibilidad de WIP pasa de ciegas al 99,2% en seis líneas de producción.
Una planta multinacional de envasado FMCG no tenía visión en tiempo real del trabajo en curso en seis líneas, y conciliaba palés a mano.
A qué se enfrentaban.
No hay ubicación en tiempo real en proceso
Seis líneas de producción funcionaban sin una vista en tiempo real de dónde estaba realmente el trabajo en progreso.
Reconciliación manual de acoplamientos
La conciliación a nivel de plataforma y puerta de muelle era un proceso manual y propenso a errores.
Brechas de trazabilidad
Las lagunas en la trazabilidad suponían un riesgo de hallazgos frente al IATF y auditorías de clientes.
Identidad del cliente reservada por confidencialidad. Las cifras reflejan resultados de despliegues RTLS/RFID comparables; sus propios números dependen del caso de uso, el entorno y la ejecución.
Neutral respecto al proveedor, orientado al resultado.
Diseñamos una arquitectura Passive RFID neutral respecto al proveedor en celdas y puertas de dock, y normalizamos las lecturas en el MES mediante un bus de eventos neutral para el proveedor para que la capa de radio siga siendo reemplazable.
Lo que entregamos.
- Passive RFID WIP en seis líneas más conciliación de muelles a nivel de palé
- Una normalización de bus de eventos lee en el MES
- Alertas Andon y análisis en vivo en línea
El resultado que vio la junta.
La pila detrás
Governance, risk and what we refuse to claim
Composite example only. Your payback depends on adoption, integration quality and exception labour — not tag unit cost. Named references under NDA on engagement.
We challenge any vendor who asks you to accept demo-day averages as production truth.
Buyer checklist, vendor challenges and engagement shape
For FMCG WIP, test product detuning and washdown survival before accepting apparel-retail accuracy analogies.
Buyer checklist before you sign: (1) written system of record for events; (2) acceptance tests with 95th-percentile performance under real interference; (3) integration owner named in IT/OT; (4) privacy or labour consultation path if people are tagged; (5) cybersecurity zoning sketch; (6) five-year TCO including batteries, spares, recalibration and SLA escalations; (7) exit/export terms so you are not hostage to a cloud tenant; (8) a pilot that can fail without political punishment.
Vendor claims to challenge in this pattern: brochure accuracy without production load; 'compliance included' without artefacts; ROI that assumes perfect adoption in 30 days; references that cannot be called under NDA; install partners who have never worked your vertical's overlays; shared support accounts; and any design that dumps locating onto a flat plant or clinical VLAN.
How TRACIO typically engages: stage-1 architecture and measurement design; vendor-neutral shortlist and RFP language; pilot acceptance criteria; then optional implementation oversight or programme rescue if a prior pilot stalled. We stay independent of hardware margin. Composite pages like this one exist so you can prepare the workshop — your numbers replace every planning band when we model payback.
Risk register themes that recur: mute fatigue on alerts; shadow spreadsheets reappearing beside the platform; battery logistics understaffed; master data too weak to support identity; works-council or IG review starting too late; and success declared on demo day before night-shift reality.
Document baseline windows explicitly: what you measured, for how long, which shifts, and what you excluded. Investment committees and auditors both punish fuzzy before/after stories. If your baseline is weak, spend two to four weeks fixing measurement before ordering anchors or portals. That discipline is cheaper than a stranded deployment and is the difference between a locating programme and a technology souvenir.
Última actualización: