Asset tracking: find the kit and stop buying spares you already own.Buying an equipment tracking system? Many stall before go-live.
Asset tracking RTLS and RFID into the CMMS or EAM you already trust: know where it is, that it is the right one, and stop buying spares you already own.
Prefer to talk? +44 20 3918 1134 · or send a short message.
Free 30-minute call with an adviser · written proposal with the price after · fixed-scope engagements from £3k.
- Who it is for
- Operations, maintenance and finance teams losing time or money to missing equipment
- What you get
- A written recommendation: technology, layout, suppliers to shortlist and a pilot plan
- How long
- Discovery 1 to 5 days on site; supplier selection typically 3 to 6 weeks
- Price
- Fixed-scope engagements from £3k. Written proposal after a free call
Asset tracking fails when search time drops but the loss process never changes.
Loss pathways
Assets leave through docks, contractors and unclear ownership. Instrument exits, not only indoor dots.
Critical few
Tag the scarce, regulated and high-rent items first. Boiling the ocean dilutes care.
Maintenance join
Location without service history is half the story. Link to CMMS for the assets that create downtime.
For what drives the price of asset tracking, see our RTLS cost guide.
Asset tracking & utilisation: how it works, and what it pays back.
The right radio for the job, mapped to your use case.
1 · Tag
Assets get a BLE/UWB tag or a passive RFID label, sized to their value and how often you need to find them.
2 · Locate
Anchors or read points fix each tag on your floor plan: searchable by name, type or zone, in real time.
3 · Prove utilisation
Dwell, idle time and movement show what you actually use, so you stop over-renting and over-buying.
Passive RFID → volume · BLE → zone · UWB → precise
Which technology fits.
We work for you, not for the technology providers.
BLE 5.x
Cost-effective room/zone location at scale.
UWB
Sub-metre where precision matters.
Passive RFID
Cheapest tag for high-volume items.
Industries this solution suits
From 20-minute hunts to 20-second finds.
A hospital biomed team tags medical equipment, wheelchairs and monitors. Staff find the nearest free device on a screen instead of walking the ward, and utilisation data reveals the fleet is far larger than it needs to be, so the next purchase is cancelled.
Typically bought by: Operations, biomed / clinical engineering, facilities, finance.
Where this solution wins: examples by sector.
Hospital medical equipment and ventilators (healthcare)
Capital equipment is over-bought because clinicians can't find free units. BLE-AoA reveals real utilisation and makes a capex reduction possible.
Forklifts and tugger fleets (manufacturing)
Forklift utilisation visibility lets ops right-size the fleet and pre-empt maintenance, freeing capital and reducing rental costs.
Returnable containers and racks (automotive)
RTI tracking across supplier-OEM loops reduces loss rates and frees working capital.
Aerospace ground-support equipment (aerospace)
GSE at hangars and on flight-lines takes time to find. RTLS shows where each unit is.
High-value tools in defence depots (defence)
Calibrated tools are FOD-critical. Loss creates safety risk and audit failure. Passive RFID eliminates loss.
Who needs this kind of programme.
Hospitals, plants and campuses wasting labour hunting shared equipment and over-buying because utilisation is invisible.
Biomed, facilities and ops who need find-rate and utilisation in systems finance already trusts.
Multi-site organisations tired of spreadsheet asset registers that disagree with reality.
What buyers compare in this market.
Buyers meet three tribes: RAIN RFID (Impinj/Zebra) for presence and choke-point accountability; BLE/Wi-Fi RTLS (Kontakt.io, Cisco/Aruba-class) for room/zone find; UWB (Ubisense, Sewio, Pozyx) for precise real-time position. Healthcare also sees CenTrak/Midmark/AiRISTA-class clinical RTLS. Each tribe sells its radio as universal. The advisory job is matching accuracy and tag cost to the decision (find vs utilise vs prevent loss).
Why asset-tracking programmes stall.
Search time drops, process unchanged. Without loss, rental and purchase rituals, ROI plateaus.
Tag everything. Capex on low-value items delays payback on the fleet that hurts.
CMMS/EAM orphan. Location that never updates the asset record becomes a second map nobody trusts.
Independent.
We don't sell hardware, so our advice stays independent. We scope the asset classes that pay back first, the accuracy band each class needs, and the EAM/CMMS integration that makes utilisation real.
Frequently asked questions
How accurate is RTLS asset tracking?
It depends on the technology, and the right level depends on whether you need 'which zone' or 'exact spot'.
UWB is usually the most precise of these options. The accuracy you get depends on your site, and we confirm it in the survey. We match the accuracy to the decision you are trying to make.
Do we have to tag every asset?
No. Start with the assets where loss, search time or low utilisation actually hurt, high-value, mobile or shared equipment. Tag those classes first, prove the return, then expand. A 'tag everything' rollout is rarely the fastest path to payback.
UWB, BLE or RFID, which is right for us?
RFID suits high-volume, low-cost presence checks at choke points; BLE is cost-effective for room or zone tracking of many assets; UWB is for precise, real-time location.
Many sites end up with a hybrid. Because we do not sell hardware, we pick per use case on the evidence of an RF site survey.
How does it integrate with our WMS, ERP or CMMS?
Location and event data flows through standard APIs and MQTT into the systems your teams already use, SAP, your WMS, MES or maintenance system, so assets appear in context, without ripping out existing software.
What is the typical ROI and payback?
The return comes from recovered search time, fewer lost assets and rentals, and higher utilisation, so you buy or rent less. Most asset-tracking cases pay back within months. We model your specific numbers before you commit to anything.
Last updated: 5 October 2026