Which technologies do you consult on?

All of the major location, identification and IoT technologies: RTLS (UWB, BLE, Wi-Fi), RFID (passive, active and Passive UHF), industrial IoT and sensors, GPS and GNSS, AGV and AMR robot fleets, and hybrid stacks that combine them. We recommend the right mix for each zone and use case, not a single technology.

Are you really vendor-neutral?

Yes. We do not sell hardware or a software platform of our own, and we take no resale commissions, so our technology and vendor recommendations serve your outcome rather than a product we need to move.

Do you work outside the UK?

We are UK-based and work across Europe and internationally, delivering in English, German and French. Engagements can be remote or on-site depending on the work.

What does a consulting engagement include?

Typically discovery and requirements, vendor-neutral technology selection, vendor evaluation and RFP support, ROI and business case, solution architecture, and an implementation roadmap. We scope each engagement to where you are.

Can you help after the decision is made?

Yes. We work across the full lifecycle - we can also deploy, integrate, and operate the system, so you can keep one independent team from business case through to live operation.

How do we get started?

Usually with a short call or a fixed-fee discovery to scope the problem, followed by a proposal with clear deliverables, timeline and fees. There is no obligation and no platform pitch.

GUIDE · INDEPENDENT

Pozyx vs Sewio — when each UWB platform wins.

Two of the most-asked-about UWB vendors in the mid-market. Both deliver production-grade UWB. The differences that matter for procurement are integration architecture, anchor sync, ecosystem maturity and commercial structure.

Book a 30-minute call Install & PMO service

At a glance.

Pozyx: Belgian UWB platform; developer-friendly architecture and integration SDK; widely used in research, sport analytics and mid-scale industrial; accuracy 10–30 cm production-grade.

Sewio: Czech UWB platform; production-line industrial focus with RTLS Studio for floor-plan modelling; widely used in automotive and manufacturing; accuracy 30 cm @ 95th percentile.

Neither vendor reseller-locks the install. Both publish RF design parameters openly enough to support independent audit. The decision is fit-to-use-case, not technology-quality.

Where Pozyx wins.

Developer-centric integration: clean Python SDK and REST API; rapid prototyping; preferred for organisations building custom location intelligence on top of position streams.

Research and sport analytics deployments where flexibility matters more than turnkey rollout.

Mid-scale industrial where in-house IT absorbs the integration work.

Where Sewio wins.

Production-line industrial deployments where turnkey RTLS Studio for design, anchor management and live visualisation is the requirement.

Large automotive WIP and process-flow deployments where platform maturity decides.

Procurement teams that want packaged solutions with vendor-led commissioning rather than SDK-led custom build.

What the comparison costs.

Both price anchors at €200–€300. Install at €1,000–€1,500 per anchor. Cost differentiator is platform tier — Pozyx is closer to "raw platform + SDK", Sewio is closer to "platform + visualisation + management".

Total programme cost is rarely decided by anchor price; it is decided by anchor count and install bill. Independent audit typically saves 30–50% on either platform vs the vendor reference design.

For the install bill, see our infrastructure and install service.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Pozyx accuracy better than Sewio?

Comparable. Both hit 10–30 cm at 95th percentile in production environments with correct anchor design. Differences come from anchor density and commissioning rigour.

Can we mix Pozyx and Sewio in the same deployment?

Not on the same RF stack. Different anchor sync architectures. You can run them in different zones if zones do not need to be position-continuous.

Which is easier to integrate into MES / WMS / ERP?

Pozyx is more SDK-first and faster for custom integration if you have in-house engineering. Sewio is more turnkey and faster if you want vendor-led integration packages.

Which has the stronger reseller / integrator network?

Sewio has the more established channel in DACH automotive. Pozyx has a broader research and developer community globally. Both can be installed independently.

Last updated: 29 May 2026